As a result, this author suggested a staged repair to the homeowner which was not only cost-effective, but would also provide long-term viability.
With only two lines present, which ran relatively short, direct, and parallel distances along with the open expanse of property between the garage and pool deck, and being only 152 mm (6 in.) below ground, replacing the lines would be relatively easy.
To fix the two problems beneath the pool deck, however, the homeowner had the option to simply link up the new jet line to the faulty tee joint or continue the repair another few inches to the nearest jet. With this in mind, this author advised the client to redo the one jet assembly, as a narrow channel had to be cut into the concrete pool deck to reach the tee joint. It was prudent to do so for this short section of old pipe (from the tee joint to the jet) as it would be susceptible to failure. The same procedure was suggested for the second jet as well.
Further, while any new tee joint could be placed in the same position as the previous one, it was suggested that they both be relocated to a central distribution position outside the pool deck, with the two subsidiary jet lines continuing independently from a new manifold-like location under the garden instead of the deck. Performing the repair in this manner was more effective as it would result in less deck removal, in addition to saving time and effort.
Many customers are rightfully concerned when a leak is found beneath the pool deck; however, these situations are not always as terrible as initially thought. For example, with proper care, the deck can be precisely cut open using a concrete saw to expose the trouble area, thus minimizing damage. The key is being absolutely certain of where the leak is occurring, which is why qualified leak detection services are invaluable.
